ICJEM
Intercontinental Journal of Emergency Medicine

The Intercontinental Journal of Emergency Medicine aims to publish issues related to all fields of emergency medicine and all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment of the highest scientific and clinical value at an international level and accepts articles on these topics.

eISSN: 2980-1400
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Online Manuscript System

Index
Original Article
Evaluation of the shetty test to exclude fractures in patients with ankle injury in the emergency department
Abstract
Aims: Ankle sprains are a leading cause of emergency department (ED) admissions. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of the Shetty Test (ST) and Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) in excluding fractures among patients with traumatic ankle injuries.
Methods: This prospective study included 216 patients presenting to the ED. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy of both ST and OAR were calculated and compared against radiographic findings.
Results: Fractures were detected in 55 (25%) patients. For the ST, sensitivity was 96.4%, specificity 61.5%, and accuracy 70.37%. For the OAR, sensitivity was 85.5%, specificity 16.1%, and accuracy 33.80%. ROC analysis showed a significantly higher Area Under the Curve (AUC) for ST (0.794) compared to OAR (0.638) (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The ST demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity compared to OAR, suggesting it is a valid and efficient method for determining the necessity of X-rays in ankle injuries.

Keywords : Shetty test, ankle injury, ottawa ankle rules, emergency medicine

Download Article


1. Akpinar C, Kavalci C, Yilmaz F, Ceyhan MA, Yilmaz MS. The validation of Ottawa Ankle Rules in a prospective study of 315 consecutive patients: a prevalence study in a single-center. Advances Res. 2014;2(4):225-230. doi:10.9734/AIR/2014/8730
2. Karen LM, Jonathan J. Ankle sprain in adults: Evaluation and diagnosis. UpToDate. 2025.
3. Köse Ö, Gökhan S, Özhasaneker A, Çeliktaş M, Yiğit Ş, Gürcan S. Comparison of Ottawa ankle rules and Bernese ankle rules in acute ankle and midfoot injuries. Turk J Emerg Med. 2010;10(3):101-105.
4. Avinca Ö, Taş M. Comparison of Shetty ankle test and Ottawa ankle rules in ankle injuries. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27(5):1852-1855. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202303_31548
5. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, et al. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(4):384-390. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82656-3
6. Broomhead A, Stuart P. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in Australia. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003;15(2):126-132. doi:10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00430.x
7. Yuen MC, Sim SW, Lam HS, Tung WK. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in a Hong Kong ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2001;19(5):429-432. doi:10.1053/ajem.2001.24474
8. Gomes YE, Chau M, Banwell HA, Causby RS. Diagnostic accuracy of the Ottawa ankle rule to exclude fractures in acute ankle injuries in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):885. doi:10.1186/s12891-022-05831-7
9. Shetty V, Wasnik S, Hegde C, Shetty V, Kasture S, Thakur H. The "Shetty test" in ankle injuries: validation of a novel test to rule out ankle fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23(7):831-833. doi:10.1007/s00590-012-1069-x
10. Jovic D, Johnson D, Tolmie L, Stanier P, Hutchins R. Shetty test in ankle and foot trauma: an emergency department pilot study assessing specificity and sensitivity. Emerg Med Australas. 2020;32(4):683-686. doi:10.1111/1742-6723.13541
11. Ak R, Kurt E, Bahadırlı S, Semih Çakır M, Bilgü AS, Kurt ŞZE. The comparison of Ottawa ankle rules and Shetty test performances in foot-ankle trauma patients visited to the emergency department. Injury. 2022;53(6):2287-2291. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.065
12. Yavas S, Arslan ED, Ozkan S, Yilmaz Aydin Y, Aydin M. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules for midfoot and ankle injuries. Acta Biomed. 2021; 92(4):e2021241. doi:10.23750/abm.v92i4.9962
13. Tintinalli JE, editor. Emergency medicine: a comprehensive study guide. 6th ed. Section twenty-three injuries to the bones, joints, and soft tissue. Ankle injuries by John A. Michael, Ian G. Stiell. 2004.
14. Canale S, Beaty J. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. 11th ed. Elsevier; 2007.
15. Daş M, Temiz A, Çevik Y. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules by general practitioners in the emergency department of a Turkish district hospital. Ulusal Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2016;22(4):361-364. doi:10.5505/tjtes.2016.72662
16. Lucchesi GM, Jackson RE, Peacock WF, et al. Sensitivity of the Ottawa rules. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26(1):1-5. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70229-6
17. Leddy JJ, Smolinski RJ, Lawrence J, Snyder JL, Priore RL. Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa ankle rules in a university sports medicine center. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(2):158-165. doi:10.1177/03635465980260020201
18. Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, Steurer J, ter Riet G. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326(7386):417. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7386.417
19. Dowling S, Spooner CH, Liang Y, et al. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and midfoot in children: a meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(4):277-287. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00333.x
20. Gravel J, Roy M, Carrie`re B. 44-55-66-PM, a mnemonic that improves retention of the Ottawa ankle and foot rules: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(8):859-864. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00731.x
21. Ojeda-Jiménez J, Méndez-Ojeda MM, Martín-Vélez P, Tejero-García S, Pais-Brito JL, Herrera-Pérez M. Experience using the «Shetty test» for initial foot and ankle fracture screening in the emergency department. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed). 2018;62(5):343-347. doi:10.1016/j.recot.2018.02.003
22. Yilmaz F, Sonmez BM, Beydilli İ et al. Spinal fractures as an indicator of concurrent other system injuries: an analysis of 242 cases. Biomed Res. 2017;28(3):1006-1011.
Article available in :
Volume 4, Issue 2, 2026
Page : 34-38
https://doi.org/10.51271/ICJEM-0075
Article Information
Received : 12 Mar 2026
Accepted : 08 Nis 2026
Published : 04 Haz 2026
Corresponding Author :

Fevzi Yılmaz: Department of Emergency, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkiye

[email protected]
Citation : Demirel C, Yılmaz F, Köse Ö, et al. Evaluation of the Shetty test to exclude fractures in patients with ankle injury in the emergency department. Intercont J Emerg Med. 2026;4(2):34-38. doi:10.51271/ICJEM-0075

Read: 168
Download : 94
Cited: 0
_Footer