ICJEM
Intercontinental Journal of Emergency Medicine

The Intercontinental Journal of Emergency Medicine aims to publish issues related to all fields of emergency medicine and all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment of the highest scientific and clinical value at an international level and accepts articles on these topics.

eISSN: 2980-1400
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Online Manuscript System

Index
Original Article
Trends and patterns in prostate cancer screening in primary care (2016–2025): a bibliometric study
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study is to examine the scientific output, impact, and collaboration patterns of the literature on prostate cancer screening in primary care over the past decade using bibliometric methods.
Methods: The study was conducted on original English research articles published between 2016 and 2025 in journals indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded within the Web of Science Core Collection database. Bibliometric analyses were carried out using Biblioshiny, the web-based interface of the Bibliometrix package running in the RStudio environment, and the VOSviewer software. Scientific output, citation performance, and keyword patterns were examined using Biblioshiny, while the network structures of co-authorship and co-citation relationships were visualized and evaluated with VOSviewer.
Results: A total of 266 original research articles were analyzed. These publications appeared in 139 journals and were produced by 2008 authors, with a mean of 8,87 authors per article and an international collaboration rate of 21,8%. Annual publication output showed a fluctuating pattern, reaching its peak in 2021. The average number of citations per article was 35,44. In the keyword analysis, “prostate cancer,” “prostate-specific antigen,” “primary care,” and “screening” were the most frequently used terms. Co-authorship analysis revealed clear clustering among authors, with the presence of core research groups. In the country-level co-authorship network, the United States of America emerged as the most dominant hub, followed by England and Australia as other major contributors. Co-citation analysis indicated that the literature is mainly structured around large-scale screening trials and clinical guidelines
Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis highlights the production, impact, and collaboration dynamics of the literature on prostate cancer screening in primary care, making the intellectual structure of the field visible and offering a guiding framework for future research.

Keywords : Prostatic neoplasms, early detection of cancer, mass screening, primary health care, bibliometrics

Download Article


1. Denijs FB, Van Poppel H, Stenzl A, et al. PSA testing in primary care: is it time to change our practice? BMC Prim Care. 2024;25(1):436. doi:10. 1186/s12875-024-02688-8
2. Benedict MOA, Steinberg WJ, Claassen FM, Mofolo N, van Rooyen C. Knowledge, attitude and practice on screening and early diagnosis of prostate cancer of primary health care providers in the Free State. African J Prim Health Care Family Med. 2023;15(1):a3688. doi:10.4102/phcfm.v15i1.3688
3. Czerw A, Deptala A, Glowacka M, et al. Prostate cancer-research advances in early detection. J Clin Med. 2025;14(9):3067. doi:10.3390/jcm14093067
4. Chai K, Xu C, Man J, Deng Y, Yang L. Evolving paradigms in prostate cancer screening: a decade of bibliometric insights and technological advancements. Front Oncol. 2025;15:1511880. doi:10.3389/fonc.2025. 1511880
5. Beltrán A, Parker L, Moral-Pérez I, et al. Impact of patients' age and comorbidities on prostate cancer overdiagnosis in clinical practice. Plos One. 2025;20(2)e0315979. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315979
6. Microsoft Corporation. (2016). Microsoft Excel (Version 2016). https://office.microsoft.com/excel
7. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetrics. 2017;11(4):959-975. doi:10. 1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
8. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R [Internet]. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC; 2023. Available from: https://posit.co
9. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523-538. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
10. Moyer VA. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(2):120-134. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459
11. Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up. The Lancet. 2014;384(9959):2027-2035. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60525-0
12. Carter HB, Albertsen PC, Barry MJ, et al. Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline. J Urol. 2013;190(2):419-426. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.119
13. Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd, et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(13):1310-1319. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0810696
14. Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European Study. New England J Med. 2009;360(13):1320-1328. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0810084
15. Misra-Hebert AD, Hu B, Klein EA, et al. Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014. Bju Int. 2017; 120(2):257-264. doi:10.1111/bju.13793
16. Nguyen KD, Hyder ZZ, Shaw MD, et al. Effects of primary care physician density, urologist presence, and insurance status on stage of diagnosis for urologic malignancies. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018;52:10-14. doi:10.1016/j.canep.2017.10.012
17. Martin RM, Donovan JL, Turner EL, et al. Effect of a low-intensity PSA-based screening intervention on prostate cancer mortality the CAP randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2018;319(9):883-895. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.0154
18. Young GJ, Harrison S, Turner EL, et al. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing of men in UK general practice: a 10-year longitudinal cohort study. Bmj Open. 2017;7(10)e017729. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017729
19. Wawryk O, Collins IM, Lee A, et al. Rural variations in primary care prostate cancer diagnosis and survival: a cohort study using linked Australian primary care electronic medical record data. Bmc Cancer. 2025;25(1)1809. doi:10.1186/s12885-025-15044-5
20. Pickles K, Carter SM, Rychetnik L, McCaffery K, Entwistle VA. General practitioners' experiences of, and responses to, uncertainty in prostate cancer screening: insights from a qualitative study. Plos One. 2016;11(4)e0153299. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153299
Article available in :
Volume 4, Issue 1, 2026
Page : 1-6
https://doi.org/10.51271/ICJEM-0068
Article Information
Received : 07 Oca 2026
Accepted : 01 Şub 2026
Published : 07 Mar 2026
Corresponding Author :

Çağrı Öktem: Department of Urology, Kulu State Hospital, Konya, Turkiye

[email protected]
Citation : Öktem Ç, Siber HK. Trends and patterns in prostate cancer screening in primary care (2016-2025): a bibliometric study. Intercont J Emerg Med. 2026;4(1):1-6.

Read: 109
Download : 66
Cited: 0
_Footer